Markus Heussen wrote:

Many thanks to you, now everything works fine :-)


yeah, we get there *eventually*


But two questions I still have:

1. Is it possible to control the position where nodes will be created within
a context? Sometimes this is necessary if the xml schema defines the
sequence of nodes.


could you be more specific?


naieve first thought: the @path attribute of the wb:context has precisely this purpose

(given your previous questions and remarks that sounds like a too simplistic answer though)

2. If the input of a date form field is for example "31.02.2004" after
submission this value is automatically set to "02.03.2004". How can I change
this behavior? Is there a attribute I can set in the woody binding or
definition file to get the behavior like using the "setLenient(false)"
method of the class SimpleDateFormat?


not yet, see other thread where you originally posted this...


Thanks for helping me!


de nada,


-marc=

Greetings, Markus


-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Marc Portier
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Dezember 2003 16:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in
source file


Yo, all.


answer is in the combination of using
- @lenient (for surviving reads from paths that don't exist yet)
- and the o.a.c.util.jxpath.DOMFactory (for creating new paths on the
target XML)

for some mysterious reason one of my commits messed up the auto-registry
of that factory on Nodes, fixed now.

regards,
-marc=



Markus Heussen wrote:


-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2003 12:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in source
file


Markus Heussen wrote:




-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Upayavira
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2003 16:49
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in

source file



Markus Heussen wrote:






Hi all.

I'm new to the Woody framework but till now it works fine

for me. But I



have




one problem I don't know how to solve at best :-(

I get the following exception when I submit the form:


org.apache.cocoon.woody.binding.BindingException: Problem

binding field


vn_titel (parent = "") to xpath v:Titel (context xpath =
"/soap-env:Envelope[1]/soap-env:Body[1]/v:Versicherung[1]/v:Par

tner[1]/v:P



er




son[1]")

org.apache.commons.jxpath.JXPathException: No value for

xpath: v:Titel



The field is defined in the form definition file and a

binding is also


defined in the woody binding file. But in one case there is no



corresponding





XML tag in my source file. In other case there is one. I

have to create



the




element if it is missing. So how can I manage this situation at best?

Who can point me to the right direction?




Not sure if I'm right here, but I think you need 'lenient'

jxpath within


binding - this means that, if jxpath doesn't find a node, it

ignores it,


rather than causing an exception.




But this is not exactly what I have to do. If there is no node

in the source



file I have to create this node before the binding saves it back to the
source. How can I manage this at best? I have no experience in

using the


woody framework. When I set @readonly to true within the

binding I get no


exceptions because there is no saving process. But in fact I

have to save


it. I tried something around <wb:insert-node/> but it didn't work :-(
<wb:delete-node/> does what I expected.

Anyone there who can give me a hint? I really need this feature.



I'm no expert either, and I've never used binding. I am talking about 'lenient' not 'readonly' or 'direction'. It was committed into CVS this morning, here's a snippet from the status.xml file:

 <action dev="MPO" type="add" >
   Changed semantics on the cforms binding. Added a @direction
(which replaces
   the @read-only) and a @lenient attribute on all binding
implementations in
   the pool.
 </action>


Still don't know if this is what you're after.


Regards, Upayavira


I spend some time learning more about this lenient thing and

meanwhile I use


a current developer version (about two hours old) for my application.

But still it doesn't work :-( Maybe somebody can explain what I'm doing
wrong. I have something like this:


woody binding: <wb:value id="vn_titel" path="v:Titel" lenient="true"/>


woody field: <wd:field id="vn_titel" required="false"> <wd:label>Titel</wd:label> <wd:datatype base="string"/> </wd:field>


On submit I get the following exception:


org.apache.commons.jxpath.JXPathException: Exception trying to

create xpath


v:Titel; Factory is not set on the JXPathContext - cannot create path:


/soap-env:Envelope[1]/soap-env:Body[1]/v:Versicherung[1]/v:Partner [1]/v:Pers

on[1]

Though it was recognized that the v:Titel node is not present

in my source


file. But what's my mistake? I also tried to set the lenient

attribute on


the parent context element but I still get the exception.

I need your help because this feature is very basic for me.

Thanks for your help.

Markus





Markus






There has been discussion on the dev list about adding this over the
last couple of days. I'm not sure if it is in CVS Cocoon yet, but I
suspect it will be within a day or so.

Regards, Upayavira





Thanks for your help, Markus.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/mpo/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to