From: Stephan Coboos > Tim Olson wrote: > > >starting with 2.1.3, a call to sendPage() or sendPageAndWait() is > >required in your script. i think it sucks but was unable to > convince > >the dev list. in 2.1.2 and earlier you can just omit any > sendPage call > >and the sitemap continues where the flowscript left off. > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Stephan Coboos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:34 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Return to the sitemap after floscript > >> > >> > >>Hello, > >> > >>is it possible to return exactly to the position in the > sitemap after > >>executing a flowscript on which this script was called, to > >>process the > >>rest of the pipeline? Maybe without using sendPage oder > >>sendPageAndWait? > >> > >><map:match pattern="foo"> > >> <map:generate type="file" src="myFile.xml"/> > >> // Go to flow here and do some logic... > >> <map:call function="myFunc"/> > >> // Come automatically back from flow and do this work... > >> <map:serialize type="xml"/> > >></map:match> > >> > >>Only if in the flowscript is sendPage or sendPageAndWait is > >>called, the > >>pipeline switches. Is it possible? > >> > >>Thank you. > >> > >>Regards > >>Stephan > >> > > > > > Oh, no!!! Why? Is this the right way?
Please see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106864448500002&r=1&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106849566300008&r=1&w=2 -- Reinhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
