Re: Evaluation of Cocoon

[Upayavira]

Eric Jain wrote:

I don't believe that flow will work correctly, as it doesn't share
its continuations, as they aren't shared within sessions.
   

Yes, that was precisely the point. In any case this does not concern me,
as pointed out my application is completely stateless...
 

Okay.

Nevertheless I'm somewhat surprised that Cocoon doesn't store state in
the session, as sessions can easily be replicated within a cluster. 

I recall a discussion about how it would be good to make it function 
correctly in a cluster, but do not believe that anything has been done 
about it. Feel free to help with patches.

I
don't think sticky sessions solve the problem completely, especially if
one of the reasons for having multiple machines is to allow users to
continue their work seemlessly even if a machine goes down or needs to
be taken offline.
 

Yup. Sticky sessions do have that failing.

Upayavira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]