Thanks. So my question is still the same : what do I have to do in order to have my action poolable ?
Vincent -----Message d'origine----- De : news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jorg Heymans Envoy� : mardi 10 f�vrier 2004 09:43 � : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Is it possible to have poolable actions ? Nope it doesn't, look at the Action interface, it extends Component. The decommissiong message you're seeing is typical for non-pooled components. You can tell whether a component is properly pooled by looking for this message in the logs, if it appears then your pool for this component is generally undersized. Jorg MAHE Vincent FTRD/DIH/REN wrote: > Do you mean that every action already implements the Poolable interface ? > > If so, why do I have these messages about "decommissioning instance of" ? > > Vincent > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Nicolas Toper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoy� : lundi 9 f�vrier 2004 17:28 > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Is it possible to have poolable actions ? > > > Well, yes you have to implement actions interface :=) See the archives and the > wiki > Le Lundi 09 F�vrier 2004 17:23, MAHE Vincent FTRD/DIH/REN a �crit : > > >>Hi, >> >>I'm using >> >>When I test my webapp in DEBUG mode, I have the following lines in the >>sitemap.log file : >> >>DEBUG (2004-02-09) 11:11.41:727 [sitemap] (/test/) >>tcpConnection-80-0/DefaultComponentFactory: ComponentFactory creating new >>instance of mobivisit.acting._common.SessionIsValidAction. DEBUG >>(2004-02-09) 11:11.41:727 [sitemap] (/test/) >>tcpConnection-80-0/DefaultComponentFactory: logger attribute is >>sitemap.action.session-isvalid DEBUG (2004-02-09) 11:11.41:727 >>[sitemap] (/test/) tcpConnection-80-0/DefaultComponentFactory: >>ComponentFactory decommissioning instance of >>mobivisit.acting._common.SessionIsValidAction. >> >>If I had pool-min or pool-max parameters in my sitemap, it doesn't change >>anything. >> >>Isn't it possible to have a Cocoon action poolable ? >> >>I have seen in the doc that there are such actions like >>AbstractXMLFormAction which implements the excalibur.pool.Poolable >>interface. >> >>Do you think I can have better performances if I implement this interface >>in my actions ? >> >>Vincent > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
