On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 12:12, Mark Lundquist wrote: > On Feb 15, 2004, at 12:03 AM, Bruno Dumon wrote: > > > <..snip..> > > > > And then there's also the "v2" woody-flowscript integration which is > > similar but more powerful. > > Is there a summary somewhere of the differences between v2, and uh... > "v1"? :-)
Here's some info on v2: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107531818111033&w=2 > > It looks like in v2, the javascript createBinding() would just be > called from the flow, is that right? (no more <map:call > function="woody", right?) I'd do the same with v1. I always create Form objects myself (like in the sample on the wiki), not relying on the "woody" function. I don't see any advantage in the woody function. The Woody samples should be adjusted in this regard. -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
