I was planning on doing this for sure, but I must get it running first with
the bare minimum. The ojb/woody sample suffers from over-sampling. Different
technologies are merged into one sample block which is very confusing if you
dont' have a clue yet on how to use it. More over the OJB/JDO technology
requirs you to do things in three different places. Not easy at all.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derek Hohls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: woody, flow and database confusion


> Bert
>
> It sounds like you have managed quite a bit of learning here;
> I have been thinking about going this route in the future but
> have not yet convinced myself that all this complexity is worth
> some (possible?) benefit.  Is there any possibility you could
> start writing up an "idiots guide" on the wiki - you may not think
> you know much but you do know a lot more than many others!
>
> Thanks
> Derek
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/02/18 01:15:29 PM >>>
> I have been trying for several days to get grips on the "super trio"
> Woody,
> Flow and OJB/JDO. I don't have any succes yet, but that is mainly to
> the
> complexity of getting OJB/JDO to run. Could someone please shed a light
> on
> this to get me going again?
>
> I have created a bean to store all form data. The Woody form and the
> FlowScipt have been created too. I have used the obj/woody sample as a
> template to get things running. That's the easy part (relatively
> speaking).
> I'm using mySQL as a databasource and have a datasource configured in
> cocoon.xconf. This datasource is used in XSP pages using ESQL without
> any
> problem, so that works for sure.
> My biggest confusion is where I need to configure the link from the
> bean
> datastore to the database. Where do I configure OJB and JDO?
> I have OJB.properties, package.jdo, repository.dtd and repository.xml
> in the
> WEB-INF/classes directory. I see a total overlap in the configuration
> in the
> package.jdo and repository.xml file. Why is that? Is either of them
> not
> needed?
>
> I have created a DAO class file too. This is a direct copy of the
> Employee_DAO class file from the samples. I only replaced the package
> and
> replaced the bean methods with the ones from my bean. All this
> compiles
> without any problem. The bean and the DAO class are packaged in a jar
> file
> and put in the WEB-INF lib directory. I assume this is where I will
> eventually create queries using OJB code to fill the bean with data. Am
> I
> correct?
>
> Thanks a lot for any help,
> Bert
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to