As far as I know, the simple-repeater binding will rewrite your whole xml part instead of locating the right row and update it. If you don't need to add/remove rows and are showing the whole xml part, you might as well use the simple-repeater (or at least try it, it won't take as much time as writing a repeater).
Kind Regards, Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antonio Gallardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:10 AM Subject: Re: [CForms] <wb:simple-repeater> > Antonio Gallardo dijo: > > Hi: > > > > I am trying to use the simple-repeater because I have a repeater without > > unique fields. We also not need any "add" or "remove" buton for the rows. > > Can the simple-repeater help? > > I realized the "simple-repeater" is not my solution. My ideal repeater is: > > 1- No "add-row" or remove-row botons required. Just can update rows. > 2- There is no unique-field (the primary key is composed from 2 values or > more). > > Need I to build a new repeater that will meet this specification? Will > other people welcome this repeater? > > We can call it: "fixed-size" repeater. > > WDYT? > > Best Regards, > > Antonio Gallardo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
