Still no luck, I have to pass the cocoon object somehow to the thread, but
when creating your runnable in the directly in the javascript, I can't see
how to pass that.
If I would create a Java thread, however, and want to pass the cocoon
object, what kind is that object? Is it possible to just give that cocoon
object to a thread and in that thread call the function
cocoon.processPipelineTo()?
Kind Regards,
Jan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Hoskens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Send Page, continue processing
> I tried to call a pipeline after a sendPage():
>
> <snip>
> cocoon.sendPage(page);
> cocoon.log.debug("page send?");
> // go ahead and do the expensive processing of generating a pdf
> var out = new java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream();
> cocoon.log.debug("outputstream ready");
> cocoon.processPipelineTo(userdir + "/" + usersubdir + "/test-pdf",
> null, out);
> cocoon.log.debug("outputtin");
> cocoon.log.debug(out.toString());
> cocoon.log.debug("done");
> out.close();
> </snip>
>
> This doesn't crash, but the client browser is still loading until pdf is
> generated. But I'm testing on one PC so maybe fop generation stalls
> everything? Is that possible?
> This isn't a thread of course, but if the sendPage() does indeed finish
> before the debugging logs "page send?", the page should be on its way to
the
> client.while the function continues. (well, that's what I would expect)
> Can I ( as a second tryout) create a thread in flowscript that calls the
> same pipe?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruno Dumon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Send Page, continue processing
>
>
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 19:14, Ugo Cei wrote:
> > > Jan Hoskens wrote:
> > > > If I use sendPage() instead of sendPageAndWait() the
> pipelineprocessing is
> > > > given back to cocoon (in the docs), so if I place some code after
> that, will
> > > > cocoon first end that function (and thus giving a response) and goes
> on with
> > > > the remaining code? I know that this isn't the idea behind that
> function, I
> > > > do use it for its normal behaviour, but it's just a thought!
> > >
> > > If I understand your question correctly, yes, code following
> > > cocoon.sendPage will be execute immediately, _while_ the response in
> > > being sent to the client.
> >
> > hmm, with "while" you imply that both are executed on separate threads?
> > This would suprise me.
> >
> > >
> > > You can check it out yourself by putting a "print" statement right
after
> > > sendPage.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/
> > Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
