While I don't feel comfortable commenting on those other projects since I
haven't used them, I do want to chime in with my views that trying to
standardize on a single framework would be very helpful. I'm pretty new to
Cocoon, and I spent so much time trying to digest what were the differences
between xml-form, woody, and jxforms etc., and which one was really the most
promising. It was VERY confusing, and almost, at times, led me back to
Struts. 

The Cocoon project will be best advanced with a well-defined set of
components or best-practice solutions, instead of a multitude of sometimes
poorly documented and fragmented choices. However, I appreciate the need to
always encourage innovation, so it's a difficult tradeoff.

Thanks,

jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Torsten Curdt
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 6:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [POLL] form frameworks

Over on cocoon-dev we are in the middle of
cleaning up the form framework situtation.

With the upcoming 2.1.5 release "Woody" is
being renamed into "CForms", "precept" is being
removed and we currently considering removing
"xml-form" and "jxforms" as well.

So in the end we finally have a single framework :)

...but since some of you folks might be
still using the deprecated packages here
comes a poll:

xml-form
[ ] keep it as deprecated in the 2.1 branch
[ ] remove it with the next 2.1.5 release
[ ] remove it with the 2.1.6 release
[ ] remove it only in the 2.2 branch

jxforms
[ ] keep it as deprecated in the 2.1 branch
[ ] remove it with the next 2.1.5 release
[ ] remove it with the 2.1.6 release
[ ] remove it only in the 2.2 branch

Thanks for your feedback
--
Torsten



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to