Arnaud This is a long and ongoing debate - I suggest you browse through the mailing list - just a search for 'struts' brings up some interesting mails (you'll see a few recent ones from me) - but it seems that very few people have actually worked extensively in both environments (or, if they have, they are not telling us about it...).
Obviously I am also biased towards Cocoon because a lot of my work is also in non-complex web sites and need for XML- based publishing. Your situation sounds somewhat similar and I one would say that if someone else wanted to NOT use Cocoon they would have to demonstrate that it has all the capabilities of Cocoon + more. BTW, I assume you have seen: http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonCompared (and the links off of it - esp to other frameworks) >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/03/12 03:09:25 PM >>> Thanks, but what the advantage of Struts against Coccon2.1 + Forms. In my opinion , Cocoon2.1 + Forms is more attractive because represent MVC+ sparation of Logic / Content /Style (is right ???) The presentation is for a company who use a lot of XML data (and many type of representation (HTML, PDF, SVG, etc..) At 14:24 12/03/2004 +0200, you wrote: >Um, you could try: >http://barracudamvc.org/Barracuda/index.html >or >http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/index.html > >which are compared here (not sure how well, >but you could use this to try and see where and >how Cocoon relates to both): >http://barracudamvc.org/Barracuda/docs/barracuda_vs_struts.html > >Of course, I am sure there other, M$-based approaches >as well - just consult the marketing dept. ;-) > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/03/12 02:11:17 PM >>> >Hi, >I have to make a presentation of Coccon and I have to present >alternative >solutions. >Do you know alternative solutions ??? > >Thanks > >Arnaud De Brem > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
