Hi, Does that means that I should kill woody2.js and use Form.js instead ?
Peter On Monday 29 March 2004 17:08, Upayavira wrote: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >Woody is being deprcated in favor of CForms. Use better CForms. > > Yes, but you still have the Form.js vs v2/Form.js question, don't you? > > My uneducated answer would be that Form.js is much more tried and tested > - v2 is a proposal that I have recently started seeing people use. > > For safety, go with Form.js. For potentially greater flexibility (I > guess) go with v2/Form.js. > > Given that cforms are still much under development, there's no > definitive answer to this. You have to use your own judgement, really. > > Regards, Upayavira > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Med venlig hilsen / Yours sincerely Peter Lerche EasySpeedy ApS http://easyspeedy.com _______________________________________ European Dedicated Server Hosting Extremely low prices, secure, and reliable Linux and BSD distributions only _______________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
