Well, not to pour cold water on that approach - it *can* work - but the best articles are usually "driven" by a single author. I'd be happy to help edit and raise issues of clarification etc - but some *one* needs to start the process...
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/15 04:02:42 AM >>> Derek Hohls wrote: > Matthew > > Obviously have been through the whole process you are in > the best position to understand this issue. > > Is there not some room for an "intemediate" approach - > a *series* of articles on key topics published in on-line > magazines - reasonably well-researched and edited; which > effectively become what would have been chapters in a book. Sure, there is room for all sorts of approaches. The best approach that i see, is to develop our own Cocoon documentation (xdocs and wiki) to be those "articles on key topics". That way it can be a group effort. --David > As you say, maybe its more for the prestige and > reputation rather than the money... but it would also serve > to both bolster Cocoon's status and become the defacto > documentation for all the new features? > > Just my .2c > Derek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
