On 04.06.2004 18:06, Peter Flynn wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10203
That's actually the reverse of this problem: the OP seems to be complaining that ancillary data retrieved from a call to the document() function is *not* being cached, whereas in fact it *is* (and shouldn't be) -- and the waters were muddied by the problem being confused with the behaviour of xsl:include.
No, it matches exactly your problem. The summary is "Docs referenced by XSLT's document() are not included in cache validity". This means the cache validity calculation of the transformation is not based on external documents, so changes in a document accessed via document() are not recognized and the cache is seen as valid.
Not important now: I coded around it. But it would be a big benefit to the behaviour of Cocoon if this was fixed: it is *not*, as Carsten suggests, a "feature request": it's a bug.
You are free to add your comment to the bug and maybe also vote for it.
Joerg
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
