Re: passing extra parameters to handleForm

[Jorg Heymans]

<snip/>
Yeah, forget about that clumsy "handleForm" and use a plain old 
function. IMO, the name of the form definition and binding belong to the 
controller (i.e. the flowscript) and not to the sitemap.
somehow i thought "handleForm" was the standard and most advanced way of 
 creating a form. I'm still looking through the docs to see where i 
found this.

<map:match pattern="*.action">
 <map:call function="myFunction">
   <map:parameter name="template" value="{1}"/>
 </map:call>
</map:match>
function myFunction() {
 var form = new Form("forms/fooFormModel.xml");
 form.createBinding("forms/fooFormBinding.xml");
 ...
 form.showForm(cocoon.parameters["template"]);
 ...
}
makes perfect sense...
And be very careful with the fact that in <map:call function>, only the 
*order* of parameters is significant, and not their names. That's why 
it's safer to have functions with no arguments and use cocoon.parameters.

copy that.
Thanks!
Jorg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]