Thank you Richard, appreciate it! rgds Paul --- Richard Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 05:52:28 -0800 (PST), "Paul > Joseph" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Hi, > > I am using an aggregate field, in a situation > where > > there may or may not be anything to enter in some > of > > the constituent fields. > > > > Also, I would like the user to be able to enter > pretty > > much anything... > > > > Shouldn't the following regex work for each field? > > > > ([.]*) > > > I don't think there's any need to put a character > class round the '.' > matcher: > > "(.*)" will match any character 0 or more times. > > Richard. > -- > Richard Lewis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ===== This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential, or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return mail and delete this communication and destroy all copies. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
