On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:06, Andre Juffer wrote:
You can also access the database directly in your script. You could return some object from persistence, which you could use to populate your bean. Maybe it is possible to use that object as the bean for the form (not tried).
IIRC, direct database access from javascript flowscripts is no longer supported. But you can create a java object that talks to the database and grabs values to place in the form if it's a new one. In other words, handle both the form submissions and the form prepopulating from your flowscript.
You are correct. This is way how it should be done. My formulation was not accurate.
Just wondering, it is therefore possible to let some java-based com.foo.Values object act as the bean for a form? Or is always required to let a javascript-based object in the flowscript act as the bean for a form, as the examples seem to imply. I have used the second approach.
A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Andre H. Juffer | Phone: +358-8-553 1161
The Biocenter and | Fax: +358-8-553-1141
the Dep. of Biochemistry | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Oulu, Finland | WWW: www.biochem.oulu.fi/Biocomputing/--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
