If your going to dynamically generate a sitemap just to get an aggregate
with all you files as parts, this seems like a bad idea. ( you can
do it but, why? )
Have you tried, Derek's solution previously mentioned in this thread
with the directory generator with the cinclude transformer?
I've used this type of approach and it has worked very well even with a
relatively large number of large xml files where the files themselves
can be somewhat large.
good luck.
Janet Yvan wrote:
Isn't it possible to dynamically generate a sitemap which would include all
the files I need in an aggregate?
Yvan
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Derek Hohls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 28 juin 2005 14:01
À : [email protected]
Objet : RE: Directory includes
Probably because use of the document() function in XSLT
is not encouraged - there have been MANY threads on
this topic before....
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005/06/28 01:51:44 PM >>>
Just for the fun of it, you could also try the directory generator and
document() function in xslt. You can use any cocoon:/ style as the
argument. Surprised noone mentioned it yet
Chris Marasti-Georg
-----Original Message-----
From: Janet Yvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Directory includes
I don't have much idea of the amount of files per directory,
but files are not very big (about 1kB per file / 20 nodes for
the heaviest files.) and I don't think I'll put more than 40
or 50 files at once, so I think XPathDirectory should fit.
However, I will try both for optimization purposes.
Yvan
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Askild Aaberg Olsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé :
mardi 28 juin 2005 10:45 À : [email protected] Objet :
Re: Directory includes
It depends on the size and number of files. I think a DOM is
built for each file, and Cocoon quickly runs out of memory then.
For a small number of files, where the filesize is low, the
XPathDirectoryGenerator works very well. For other cases, the
alternative approach from Derek is much better.
Askild
-
Derek Hohls wrote:
Hmm - I could never get this approach to work... and I think the
DirectoryGenerator / CInclude approach might be more flexible. Your
choice!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
