Answering my own question:
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 13:47 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with the binding to elements that have a namespace
> declared.
>
> I am using the dynamicrepeater example.
> I saved the outcome of the example to a file
> form.save(doc);
> saveDocument(doc, "PATH_TO_SAVE_THE_FILE").
>
> I then changed the example code a wee bit further by adding
> form.load("URI_TO_DATA");
> before the
> form.showForm("DYNAMICREPEATER");
>
> I have now the form showing up with the values I used before (like I
> suspected).
>
> When I change in the input file ("URI_TO_DATA"):
> <contracts xmlns="http://testing.com/";>
> ...
> </contracts>
> then I do not see the preselection and cannot save the form anymore.
>
If you do not use the standard namespace (xmlns="http://testing.com/";)
but xmlns:contracts="http://testing.com/"; then it is working again.
Is this a bug that I cannot use the standard namespace?
salu2
> How can I have namespaces in the input data xml and still be able to see
> the preselection and save the form.
>
> TIA for any tips or ideas.
>
> BTW in nearly all the examples that I saw, there is the following flow
> [1]:
> form = new Form("DEFINITION");
> form.showForm("DYNAMICREPEATER");
> form.createBinding("DYNAMICREPEATER");
>
> If you use here the form.load("URI_TO_DATA"); before the
> form.showForm("..."); you will get an exception, because you need to
> have a form definition first to bind your input stream to. That can be
> done with the following order [2]:
> form = new Form("DEFINITION");
> form.createBinding("DYNAMICREPEATER");
> form.load("URI_TO_DATA");
> form.showForm("DYNAMICREPEATER");
>
> Why do we use [1] and not as default [2]? It took me some time to
> understand why my example was failing till I used [2].
>
> salu2
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
