On 26.04.2006 19:59, Edward Elhauge wrote:
<map:match pattern="continuePipe/*.continue"> <map:call continuation="{1}"/> </map:match>Note that you shouldn't need the <map:serialize> after the continuation call, as the continuation itself should call a pipeline to produce the view. Same goes for the formPipe/** pipeline.The reason I put in the line: <map:serialize type="xml" /> was to make sure that the pipeline "knew" that the output of that pipeline was XML. Most of the examples of Jx and continuations I've seen are outputting HTML. Whereas I'm outputting XML for further processing by my portal and aggregation pipeline. Is the difference between HTML and XML irrelevant at that stage? Am I adding an unnecessary serialization process or step by adding that line, or is it merely syntactically redundant?
As Jason already wrote: This pipeline does not result in an XML stream, but only starts flowscript execution. From the flowscript some code delegating to another pipeline must be executed. You must have anything with redirectTo or sendPage(AndWait) in your flowscript.
Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
