Hi Seth, this indeed is great! After looking through all the possible extensions of OutputStream, I actually found one that doesn't need a receiving end or file object, so I now call my desired pipeline with a ByteArrayOutputStream.
Thanks a lot! regards, christian Seth Foss schrieb: > What I have found works best for me is to use flowscript, and call the > pipeline using the processPipelineTo() function instead of the sendPage > or sendPageAndWait. processPipelineTo does not send it's output to the > screen, but sends the output stream back to flowscript. This allows you > to follow the processPipelineTo function with a sendPage or > sendPageAndWait that is completely unrelated to the source-writing > pipeline. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
