you are right, it's an DOM object. However, I tried getElementByTagName(), but
I didn't get any output.
Below is the the entire flowscript:
cocoon.load(
"resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/flow/javascript/Form.js");
function square() {
var form = new Form("fields.xml");
form.createBinding("binding.xml");
var quadrat;
var bean = createBean();
form.load(bean);
form.showForm("formtemplate-page");
form.save(bean);
var number = bean.getElementsByTagName("beannumber");
var square = number * number;
cocoon.sendPage("result-page", {"square" : square});
}
function createBean() {
var file = "data.xml";
var bean = null;
var source = null;
var resolver = null;
var parser = null;
try {
resolver = cocoon.getComponent(
Packages.org.apache.cocoon.environment.SourceResolver.ROLE);
source = resolver.resolveURI(file);
var is = new
Packages.org.xml.sax.InputSource(source.getInputStream());
is.setSystemId(source.getURI());
parser = cocoon.getComponent(
Packages.org.apache.excalibur.xml.dom.DOMParser.ROLE);
bean = parser.parseDocument(is).getDocumentElement();
} finally {
if (source != null) {
resolver.release(source);
}
cocoon.releaseComponent(parser);
cocoon.releaseComponent(resolver);
}
return bean;
}
This is my data.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<root>
<beannumber>5</beannumber>
</root>
Thanks in advance
Saskia
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:10:29 -0700
Von: Mark Lundquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Access to XML bean elements in flowscript/javaflow
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
>
> > That's what I meant: if the bean is a dom -->
> > bean.getElementsByTagName("foo")
> >
> > and I wrote that my former "bean.lookupWidget" should be replaced by
> > "form.lookupWidget"
>
> Ah, I get it... you weren't answering his question of how to access
> something in 'bean' (whatever that is :), rather you were suggesting
> the alternative of querying the form widget value itself (from which
> the bean property should have been set by the binding save()). Is that
> right?
>
> That would have the disadvantage that the form widget.value is a
> String, whereas the bound object property will have been converted by
> some Converter to its proper datatype.
>
> Anyway another poster said that the OP's binding was wack, so maybe
> that will turn out to be his problem.
>
> peace,
> —ml—
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
