Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió:
Marc Driftmeyer napisał(a):
If Banking Institutions are the reason then we should fork the tree to
have two branches ala Firefox.
One that targets legacy systems and the other for moving the system
forward.
There are already two branches! One "2.1.x" and another "trunk". When
we C2.2 is out, then we have three branches: 2.1.x, 2.2.x, trunk.
Trunk would be used as line for 2.3/3.0 development, there would go
stuff like OSGi. 2.1.x branch would be maintain only for critical bugs
and fixes but it is what should banking institutions expect. Now,
being stuck with Java 1.4 they do not expect it to support annotations
in the future. Why they should not go for the same when it comes to
Cocoon?
I hope our developers will agree to use 1.5 for 2.3/3.0. ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
