> Ard Schrijvers wrote: > >> That's a mistake I made, too. Think pull, not push! > >> > > > > I had rather not use these terms in this context since the > entire cocoon pipeline mechanism is based on push and not on > pull. A pipeline does not pull a SAX stream!! > > > > Think push :-) > > > > Yesno... > > Inside a pipeline a Generator calls SAX methods of a connected > Transformer which calls methods of another Transformer and so on till > calling the SAX methods of a Serializer. From this point of > view it's push.
Where did you read this? Doesn't sound like push to me, and not like the way it works > But... You can't process data through a pipeline A and then say at the > end of the pipeline "now push this data to another pipeline > B". You only > may call pipeline A from pipeline B and use the data it has processed. > From this point of view it's pull. Creating compound pipelines has nothing todo with the concept of push or pull the way we are used to talk about push and pull, hence my remark that I would rather not mix up these terms the way you do Ard > > Think different :-) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
