Ard Schrijvers napisał(a): > > To summarize here: > > 1) In a pipeline setup where all components implement CacheableComponent > *and* are cached (remember jx): > Grzegorz describes it right > > 2) In a pipeline setup where *not* all components implement > CacheableComponent: > Joerg describes it right > > So in fact, both are right depending on the circumstances
Thanks Ard. I've expected this response as we've touched your little toy - caching ;-) Now I'm little bit lost, isn't it that one can use caching-point pipeline instead of internal subpipelines? I thought that caching-point pipelines work similarly to the situation that for every new component in the processed pipeline something like new subpipeline is being created. That means if we have generator G, transformer T and serializer S, the cache entries would be: G, GT, GTS (every processing stage is cached) Am I correct? -- Grzegorz Kossakowski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
