Hi Baptiste, > It may be simpler with heavy client side JavaScript as in solution c). > You may even reorder the table with it . > It may be a little heavy on the size on the page though. > What is the problem with solution d) for screenreaders ?
I bet it's better to have <table> for tables/tabular data where <div> is more for visual arrangement. The latter is not as important for screenreaders/visually impaired as the structure indicated by well-arranged table/thead/tbody/tr/th/td. At the moment I use a mix of c) and d) according to [http://www.dev-archive.net/articles/table-in-css.html]. Not the holy grail I sought after, but working for now. At a later point in time we'll perhaps have a real professional for redesigning the page. Florian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
