On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:36:09 +0200, Grzegorz Kossakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> FYI I personally would vote against making it the default, >> partly because I prefer the framework not do unexpected magic > conversions, >> but mostly because it's a backward-incompatible change and would break > lots >> of existing flowscript code. I would, however, be in support of making > it >> easier to set the javaPrimitiveWrap configuration, perhaps on a more >> granular basis rather than globally if possible. > > Jason, are you strong in your opinion about not making it default?
I could probably be convinced otherwise, as long as it's easy to restore the current behavior; let's see what others think. > I think we could make it default in Cocoon 2.2 as it's not considered to > be fully > backwards-compatible and make it easy to switch to previous behaviour. > Default settings should > reflect what majority of people (including users) think is reasonable. I'm > rather surprised that it > this javaPrimitiveWrap option is not enabled already. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
