Yeah, I am not sure. Somebody told me that it should be created in a XML-based way with the version 2007, but I thought it would already be in Microsoft Office 2003 version.
When you say: "binary Excel format and a second XML-based one", are you telling that we have a binary format (that we visualize with a notepad editor, for example), right? But, what about a "second XML-based one"? You want to say that into the binary file, is there a XML-based file? If, is it, I only would like to work with it to do that steps that I mentioned. If anybody could tell me if Cocoon is the better tool to do this, and if Office 2003 really work with XML-based, I would thank you. I just have to handle with all that file types, but I don't know if Cocoon can help me and the fact of Office 2003 work with XML-based files is better or not. It seems that is better. Thanks in advance! Luiz On 10/17/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 17.10.2007 9:02 Uhr, Luiz Antonio Falaguasta Barbosa wrote: > > >> On the other hand, the newer office productivity file formats are all > >> XML-based (both OpenDocument and that other Microsoft equivalent) and > >> Cocoon excels at handling XML. > > > > Yeah man! That's point for me now! > > My client told me that I can consider the usage of Office 2003 for the > > users. So, all the office types are XML-based, right? > > Are they really? Isn't there still the binary Excel format and a second > XML-based one? I'm absolutely not sure, haven't worked with it myself. > Just what I "heard" ... > > Joerg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
