First, this is just my opinion. Although I have Windows XP and use it all the time, I despise using it for anything other than windows specific applications. I use VMWare on Windows so I can develop in Ubuntu on my Windows laptops. I have had too many weird things happen in Windows to use it anymore for development or testing work. I used cygwin for quite a while and it helps about 95% of the time, but the other 5% sucks. Now having gotten that off my chest I will say that we will support Windows XP because we can run and test there.

Second, as this link, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/support/endofsupport.mspx, points out,Windows 98 hasn't been supported by MS for over a year and a half. You can hardly expect open source developers to test or support that system, especially since you'd be hard pressed to find a commercial company any more that does. We can only test on the hardware and operating systems we have.

Ralph



Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
I am teaching HTML, CSS, and XSL (=Cocoon) to people using Win98 PCs.
If Maven2 will not run on Win98, neither will Cocoon-2.2.  I'll use
Cocoon-2.1 for the class.

Teaching Cocoon 2.2 is a much better idea since it's far more lightweight and 
has nice plugin for
RAD development which is probably a big advantage for people learning (and 
making mistakes).

It's maybe a good idea to get back on making working under Win98. I have no 
idea about Maven
internals but since it's purely Java-based project it should work. I cannot 
help you with Maven
hacking because I simply do not have access to Win98...

I'll start a new thread about attempting to run Cocoon-2.2 on Win2003
for a different project.  I know Cocoon-2.2 is still just a release
candidate, but a release cacndidate should at least install and run.

Since Win2003 is NT-based system Maven should work on it out of the box (I 
believe).


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to