Joerg Not sure if you are speaking for the dev team here? What exactly does "kind of obsolete" mean - has it been deprecated, or is it still a valid component in 2.2? Or is there is some other meaning?
Thanks. >>> On 2008/07/19 at 01:08, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joerg Heinicke >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree with Boris. In Cocoon 2.2 the database block is kind of obsolete. An application should rather be developed with more standard means as provided by Spring. Cocoon was never very good at integrating database stuff. Joerg On 06.06.2008 10:05, Johannes Hoechstaedter wrote: > I know, cocoon is based on spring. But isn't there another possibility > with cocoon blocks only? There is this database-block. What it is good > for, when I have to write my own spring application? I want to write as > less code as possible. > > Johannes > >> Johannes -- you may want to search for tutorials on using databases with >> Spring. My understanding is that with Cocoon 2.2 it is best to have >> Spring configure and manage any database connections. Then you can add >> Cocoon features (eg, the SQL transformer or whatever) once that is set >> up. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks Transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
