Yes, I understood this point I think.
But which the of generator must I call there ? No particular type ?
It may like this ?
Because if it's supposed to work, the error I meet when I use a generator must
be due to something else.
Patricia
Le 23 mars 2012 à 16:04, Robby Pelssers a écrit :
> You should not use map:read but map:generate when you want to do further
> processing.
>
> <map:match pattern="*/tree-expo-content">
> <map:generate
> src="cocoon://{1}/tree-expo-get-children"/>
> <map:transform src="exist/xsl/expotree2html.xsl"/>
> <map:serialize type="html"/>
> </map:match>
>
>
> From: Patricia Déchandol [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Problem in designing pipelines
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem understanding how to write my pipelines.
>
> I have a first pipeline :
>
> <map:match pattern="*/tree-expo-get-children">
> <map:generate type="xquery"
> src="exist/xq/get-children-rubriques.xq">
> <map:parameter name="parentid" value="{1}"
> />
> </map:generate>
> <map:transform
> src="exist/xsl/get-children-rubriques.xsl"/>
> <map:serialize type="xml"/>
> </map:match>
>
> This pipeline works perfectly resulting a XML tree.
> I would want to applicate another XSL to the resulting XML.
>
> You will say that I just have to put another <map:transform> after the first
> one.
> But I can't, because of a particularity : the call to this first pipeline is
> iterative : the transform call this same pipeline.
>
> So I thought about writing another :
>
> <map:match pattern="*/tree-expo-content">
> <map:read
> src="cocoon://{1}/tree-expo-get-children"/>
> <map:transform src="exist/xsl/expotree2html.xsl"/>
> <map:serialize type="html"/>
> </map:match>
>
> The problem is that when I execute this pipeline, I get the XML document
> resulting from the map:read but the transform is not performed.
> If I put a map:generate replacing the map:read, the execution fails with an
> error in declaration of my XSL.
>
> I don't understand how I can chain these transforms.
> Which generator could work ?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Patricia
