I'd say yes but I never tested it. Emmanuel
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, benoit LUTTRINGER < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so my SVN_HOME/bin has to be in the PATH anyway. > > But now let's say that I define the A environment variable (value : > "aaa"), and then the B environment variable which value is "$A:bbb". > Will the value of B finally be "aaa:bbb" during the build? > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 9 avril 2008 14:43 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Re: Environment variable resolution > > Installations are used only for the build part and not for the scm > actions, > so you SVN_HOME won't be used except if you use it in your build. > > Emmanuel > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:41 PM, benoit LUTTRINGER < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Is this possible that Continuum resolves environment variables ? > > > > For instance, let's say I define the SVN_HOME variable through > > continuum, using 'Installations'>'Environment variable'. > > > > Then, using the same mean, I create the environment variable PATH which > > value is < $PATH : $SVN_HOME/bin > (I work under Linux). > > > > > > > > Will the PATH variable be created and resolved correctly ? > > > > I suppose not but who knows ? :-) > > > > I see there must be a problem regarding the order in which the continuum > > application declares environment variables at the process's beginning. > > > > > > > > If this is not possible yet, maybe it would be a great enhancement for > > the future. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your answers. > > > > > > > > Benoit > > > > >
