On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Raffaele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Should the correct behaviour be that if there was a source change, a > build > > should be done either with or without "Fresh build" checked option? > > > if source changed, with/without "Fresh build", a build is started and this > part works fine. We use it every days on few servers. > > Emmanuel, I'm trying for days to launch a scheduled build (defined by me) > WITH Fresh build WITH source changes BUT Continuum says: > the project was not built because no changes were detected in sources since > the last build.
With "Fresh Build", you must check use actually the "Always build" too. With both checked, the build should work. > > > And so, I'm wrong in something or your every days test aren't telling the > truth? > In your environment do you use default build definitions or you have your > own? In production, we have both. The public environment is on apache.org : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/ And I have some others that are private on several OS and databases. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/The-project-was-not-built-because-no-changes-were-detected-in-sources-since-the-last-build.-tp18687862p18714547.html > Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
