To my knowledge this level of detail is not shown. Perhaps your dependency table was corrupted - you didn't mention whether the projects still listed dependencies in their info pages? With a release coming out very shortly that it might be worth trying.
Cheers, Brett 2008/9/8 smitherz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > I just checked my scheduled builds and they ran in alphabetical order. I > have to get this straightened out soon. We have a release scheduled for > this > weekend. At the moment I am going to have to "schedule" them manually. > > Any thoughts as to how I can get continuum to spit out its queue sorting > results just before it queues jobs? I am about to blow away the install and > rebuild it clean if I thought it would fix it. I don't have any real users > defined and just the 25 projects that are critical to be built here. > > Scott > > > Brett Porter wrote: > > > > Did this resolve itself? > > One thing to check the difference of is the dependency elements in > > individual projects still exist. > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > 2008/9/6 smitherz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am running version 1.1 for quite some time and have not had any > >> significant issues with it. However today I logged into > >> my instance and browsed to a project group and hit "build all project" > >> button. When I usually do that it only builds the > >> projects in the group I am looking at. Today it did all projects defined > >> in > >> continuum. > >> > >> That was not the biggest issue though... it queued them up in > >> alphabetical > >> order and not in the proper build order that it > >> normally does. This of course was bad news. I resorted to firing up an > >> old > >> 1.03 instance on a windows box and launching > >> a build there to get the sort order. Then manually queued them in the > >> proper > >> order. This group has 25 projects in it. > >> The last generates an ear of the others. > >> > >> Thoughts on what is happening? I tried de-queueing then stopping and > >> restarting the instance but that didn't help. I have a > >> scheduled run that starts at 23:00 eastern/US and I will have to see > what > >> order it gets run in. > >> > >> Scott > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Build-ordering-suddenly-changed.-tp19342446p19342446.html > >> Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Build-ordering-suddenly-changed.-tp19342446p19371174.html > Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
