On 26/02/2010, at 10:33 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Brent Atkinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't think I'm getting what this is driving at. Is this a question of >> whether we'd like to visualize recursive builds more like the default >> behavior? > > I'm arguing it's working as designed -- you built the parent project, > you get a status on the parent project. > > Some users I work with expected to see the status on the other > projects in the group, which are technically modules under that > parent, also change.
I still don't understand what you're saying - actually it almost sounds like a misconfiguration. Are you using a group with all the modules added as individual projects, or was the project added using the flag on the add page that results in a single project for the whole tree? And you're saying that the parent project is set to build recursively or non-recursively (-N) ? > > Perhaps one of them will chime in. :) > > [aside: it is insanely confusing that a "module" in Maven is a > "project" in Continuum which is different from a "project" in Maven!] A project in Continuum is the same as a project in Maven. A module in Maven is a name for a type of Maven project participating in an aggregate build. - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
