On 02.08.2005, at 03:11, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I want to warn you that I'll soon commit the stat(2) changes and if
you
:have a custom kernel config, you really want to have COMPAT_DF12,
:otherwise the kernel won't even make it through a reboot.
Hmm. This makes me a bit uncomfortable. I'm worried that we are
going to get a ton of bug reports from people who get caught out in
the code, despite the warning. Maybe we should invert the sense of
the option. e.g. NO_COMPAT_DF12.
or we add something like nooptions COMPAT_DF12like NetBSD did. inverts the sense in config. Default on, nooptions = off.
cheers simon -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low $$$ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
