On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:32:04AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On 2005-08-17, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are a lot of small things I came to love over the time, e.g. > > support for shlock, (b)make package also building the packages of its > > dependencies (that'S IMO the most annoying thing in ports). I think that > > 'make package-recursive' in ports has existed for a couple of years...
It's not the same. Under pkgsrc, bmake package recursive gives you packages for all newly build software, which is an important difference if you run a make clean in between. It is also the default behaviour, but it doesn't hurt as badly as package-recursive and is save to use. package-recursive traverses the full dependency list, which can be a lot of stuff e.g. for KDE. Joerg
