On 8/19/05, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Eduardo Tongson wrote: > > > Neat stuff there. > > Instead of those .spec files or XML I think using a light database like > > sqlite to store metadata is worth it. What do you think? > > I'd prefer not to depend on more tools or libraries not provided by > default. > Good point
> I see yum also uses sqlite on the client side. Yum appears to only > download gzipped xml files. Then yum puts it into that sqlite format after > retrieved. > Oh I didn't know yum was using sqlite, but then i find it slower than apt4rpm > I don't know sqlite. But I think that for now native dbopen(2) might be > fine if we really need speedier access. > It's probably adequate for the task --ed
