Perhaps I have a stake in one of the "beta quality OSes" (FreeBSD 5.x+, Dragonfly, etc) actually becoming useful? Its very frustrating to see a strong solid OS with a strong management team fragment into a bunch of mini-teams, none of which have a wide-enough range of expertise to be ultimately successful.
You obvioulsy have no-one on your "Team" than is strong in networking, because you don't even have the ability to understand the issues (apparently), much less come up with viable solutions. If the performance of Makeworld is your criteria, and you have no large network exposure (since you are in denial of packet loss and think that flow controlling a loaded gigE switch is a "solution"), I don't see how there is any chance for success beyond a being a "neat desktop OS". I'm feeling a bit like Charlton Heston in "The Planet of the Apes" here. Long Live Matt! Long Live Matt! --- Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dude, if you have made and are making millions > of benjamins, I don't > a person in his right mind would be spending > his time arguing Gig-E > performance speeds on a mailing list for a > beta-quality OS. :-) > > If I was a person that made millions, I would > definitely be planning > on buying an AMG convertible and thinking of > buying some Cuban cigars. > > So please, lay off the shit of how much you > make and talk some sense > here. No, we don't think Matt is all singing > all dancing and knowing, > BUT, he does talk sense most of the times. > > Anyway, this feels like troll targeting a lot. > If you really think > Matt is right, or people who agree with his > viewpoints, then do > provide some numbers and we will take it from > there. > > Kind Regards, > > -- > Hiten Pandya > hmp at dragonflybsd.org > > Danial Thom wrote: > > I, on the other hand, have made millions of > $$ > > designing and selling network equipment based > on > > unix-like OSes, so I'm not only qualified to > > lecture on the subject, but I'm also > qualified to > > tell Matt that he's dead wrong about just > about > > everything he's said in this thread. If you > think > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
