On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:37:31PM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, April 19, 2006 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:37AM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > >> Is there a reason we would not want this to be default behavior? i.e. > >> release with DEPENDS_TARGET and BINPKG_SITES defined? > > > > Because you want to build from source to get specific options etc.? > > BINPKG_SITES with a default value would make sense though. > > > Wouldn't people who want to build from source with specific options be > doing 'bmake (options) install"?
Depends. I *think* it is more common to place them in /etc/mk.conf, but that might differ. Joerg
