On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 08:50:25 +1000 "Dmitri Nikulin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>there is no point in DragonFly >working to be a user-friendly desktop OS now, since such efforts often >get in the way of Real Work like the heroic effort Matt has applied to >the kernel architecture, and so would defeat the point of DragonFly. >We already have DesktopBSD and PC-BSD, and they're comparable to Linux >in overall quality, so what's the problem? FYI, the leader of m0n0wall, talking about the feature of his OS mentioned that DragonFlyBSD is not even taken into consideration by him to base his system on, 'cause it's 'desktop oriented.'
