--- Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Mark Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Taken when the interrupt in top was at > 22%, building world: > > > > > > 320 total > > > 279 clk > > > 37 fxp0 > > > 4 ata1 > > > > > > Taken when the interrupt in top was at 5%, > still building world: > > > > > > 288 total > > > 281 clk > > > 7 fxp0 > > > ata1 > > > > > > Watching it in real-time there are some > spikes where either fxp0 or ata1 > > > will go up to about ~40-60, but it doesn't > really seem to relate to the > > > number seen in top if you ask me... > > > > All of that looks quite normal. It certainly > shouldn't > > account for a significant CPU interrupt > percentage. > > Either top(1) is lying, or something else is > fishy. > > > > Best regards > > Oliver > > > > They were taken with systat as per Danials > suggestion by the way, and I > noticed afterwards it actually shows CPU states > like top, slightly > different from top, probably just due to the > different times they were > started and stuff, but still didn't really seem > to relate to the > relatively high number. > > I have noticed that INVARIANTS is in the > GENERIC kernel config, might > that have anything to do with it? > I just made mysql on a 4.9 Freebsd box and I get 50-80% interrupt usage. Its probably long disk stop-and-waits or something. I'd guess its nothing unusual. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
