On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Not enough functionality. A basic refusal by the authors to bring
Which functionality is missing? Usually sm8 is considered the MTA with the most functionality. > the feature set into the 21st century. The code is a huge mess. They What did the authors refuse? > added threading without dealing with races. They added all sorts of sendmail 8 has threads only in libmilter. Where are the race conditions? Note: I _really_ would like to know this. I agree that the sm8 code is a (20 year old) "mess", but I do not know about those items that you mention above (and I should know as I'm the maintainer of sendmail). > junk without cleaning up the existing junk. I never liked the sendmail > code but I really *HATE* it now. That's why I am writing sendmail X. Give it a try. http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/sm-X/