On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:34:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Obviously I spoke too soon for this part; powerd is too hard to port > > without cpufreq framework. I'm going to commit est driver alone for now > > and work on a DragonFly patch for estd(if Johannes Hofmann hasn't started > > it yet). > > That's why I suggested that it might be easier to use the code from > NetBSD. The infrastructure daemons like estd are in pkgsrc after all.
Yes, I did read your suggestion and looked at estd code, but messing with cp_time[] array looked awful at that time :)
