On Thu, July 13, 2006 10:01 am, Dimitri Kovalov wrote: > I listen to this. Very interesting. I only challange one > thing. You say that 1.6 is more stable than FreeBSD 4.x. > How can you make this claim? FreeBSD 4.x is installed in > 1000s of servers and network devices for many years, and I > don't hear of anyone using Dragonfly for more than a > corporate server or firewall. So how can you claim such > stability before it is battle tested?
Because a good number of the issues fixed date back to FreeBSD 4.x?
