On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:58:11 -0800 (PST) Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Include ALTQ in generic? Hmm. I would personally rather not, unless > a really good case is made for including it. The only reason why I say this is the fact that many would like to use BSD flavors as home routers with transfer rate limiting, and regular lines don't require a too powerful computer, an 586 or 686 will do (we were NATing 10Mbit with a PI-133 and 48M EDO RAM.) On these machines, kernel building takes hours. > We *are* including > kernel sources on the ISO now, so perhaps a better solution would > be to create a section on how to set up a kernel build infrastructure > given just a freshly installed ISO. Do you mean the nativekernel target? -- Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> University Of Szeged, HU Faculty Of General Medicine /* Please do not CC me with replies, thank you. */