On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>     Include ALTQ in generic?  Hmm. I would personally rather not, unless
>     a really good case is made for including it.   

The only reason why I say this is the fact that many would like to use BSD 
flavors as home routers with transfer rate limiting, and regular lines don't 
require a too powerful computer, an 586 or 686 will do (we were NATing 10Mbit 
with a PI-133 and 48M EDO RAM.) On these machines, kernel building takes hours.

>     We *are* including 
>     kernel sources on the ISO now, so perhaps a better solution would
>     be to create a section on how to set up a kernel build infrastructure
>     given just a freshly installed ISO.

Do you mean the nativekernel target?

-- 
Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
University Of Szeged, HU
Faculty Of General Medicine

/* Please do not CC me with replies, thank you. */

Reply via email to