Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It's a moot point until Matt can evaluate modifying existing filesystems vs building a new one, though. I don't want NIH-ism to get in the way of having something neat, though
Yah. I think porting ZFS and possibly inventing a new FS or pimping up ZFS can run in parallel and thus ZFS _should_ be done. cheers simon -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
