Hasso Tepper wrote: > About release number I have one concern though. A lot of code I have > written during last year checks for __DragonFly_version >= 190000. It > would be nice to see it working after 1.10 release as well ;).
why were there so many zeroes in the first place? Now we have to live with it :/ 0x010a0000 <><>< > | | \ maj min patchlevel or are there applications where we can't deal with hex? then of course 1010000 or 1100000 or even 100100000 or we introduce a new version variable! yay! cheers simon
