Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I'm not planning on it for 2.0, just getting HAMMER's base > functionality implemented is already pretty challenging. But there's > nothing particularly difficult about the concept. >
lo.. been AWOL awhile but lurking. anyway, what's the take on a simple hook for vn/vnconfig or similar. seems like that would be a simple way to get the basic functionality without too much VFS muckery.. 2c
