Jasse Jansson wrote: > First of all, thanks Simon for the links, It sure was interesting reading. > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Bjørn Vermo wrote: > >> I have toyed with the idea that one drive in a mirrored pair ought to >> have the addresses inverted, so sector 1 on one drive is mapped to >> sector MAX -1 on the other. > > I read it like the locality (radius) of the errors occur on the same disc, > so I don't see the benefit from your "reversed mirror strategy". > > You will also get some interesting performance problems to tackle, when > one disc works on the inner tracks and the other one is on the outer > tracks.
Or you get benefits for reads :) cheers simon
