:> I really don't like this idea. Adding braces and dummy do/while,
:> but I don't like casting the passed expression to void simply as
:> a means of avoiding a compiler warning.
:
:The cast is needed as the value of the element should explicitly be
:ignored for the default macro.
:
:> What is this RB_AUGMENT stuff used for anyway? It looks to me like
:> it should just be removed.
:
:The older UVM map code in NetBSD at least used it to recompute the area
:covered by a subtree as the tree is rebalanced. That is the only use
:case I am aware of.
:
:Joerg
Lets remove it entirely, then. It is a horrible hack. Any objections?
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[email protected]>
